The Macroeconomic Effects of Hurricane Katrina

Published: 2021-06-29 07:06:44
essay essay

Category: Miscellaneous

Type of paper: Essay

This essay has been submitted by a student. This is not an example of the work written by our professional essay writers.

Hey! We can write a custom essay for you.

All possible types of assignments. Written by academics

Hurricane Katrina was a devastating storm that struck in parts of Southern Louisiana, Mississippi, and Alabama on August 29, 2005. Aside any other natural disaster, hurricane Katrina deeply affected the economy. Katrina can be translated into the aggregate demand and aggregate supply structure of study. It damaged labor and capital, ultimately affecting the economy's ability to produce goods and services. The measure of economic output is GDP; it measures new production. The destruction of the capital stock caused by hurricane Katrina is not part of the GDP measurement (Gordon 323-324). The loss of labor as well capital reduced the world's ability to produce new goods and services. The average state has about 2 percent of the economy's capital stock. Louisiana has only 1 percent and half of that was destroyed by Katrina. In September 2005 the United States economy lost 400,000 jobs due to Katrina. The monthly average job creation was reduced by 30,000 jobs for the rest of the year 2005 (
Macroeconomics considers the performance of the economy as a whole, focusing on inflation, economic growth, trade performance, changes in employment and unemployment. Should Hurricane Katrina be blamed for stirring up inflation? The price of gasoline soared immediately before, during, and after Katrina. Sadly, the prices of other imported goods like bananas, coffee, chicken, corn, and more skyrocketed due to the supply interferences and higher transportation costs. Residents could not afford to build or rebuild their homes as the price of lumber increased because suppliers knew the demand would be high. The prices of the imported goods led to higher energy cost, which caused a major threat to the economic growth. Economic growth supplies the resources for people to enjoy better living standards and opens doors for people to find a job. Many homes were destroyed by Katrina due to storm flooding and wind causing the affected residents to temporarily remain in other unaffected cities.
What exactly did the United States Federal Reserve Board (Fed) do to keep the inflation under control, did they raise or lower interest rates post Katrina? The Feds chose to ignore the current economic brunt due to Katrina's disaster and imposed a boost in interest rates. They recognized the hindrance due to higher energy prices, dislocation of economic activity, employment and production raising rates to target wages and living standards of the working class. The Feds also saw it as a way to prevent the chances of government expenditures in the reconstruction of areas devastated by Katrina and the economic stimulus striking an increase in the real wages of American workers. Ultimately working people had to bear the full burden of increased fuel prices and the general destruction caused by Katrina. In this matter the fiscal and monetary policy would be pointless in trying to steer the economy in a path to full employment (

Warning! This essay is not original. Get 100% unique essay within 45 seconds!


We can write your paper just for 11.99$

i want to copy...

This essay has been submitted by a student and contain not unique content

People also read